System Test Report - General Ledger Autotest - PostgreSQL

System Test Report - General Ledger Autotest - PostgreSQL

Database platform #

PostgreSQL

Summary

Close
Tests Failures Errors Success rate (%) Execution time Execution time trend
63 0 0 100 52m48.689s
Loading...

Test Suite: BatchJobPostgreSQLTest

Tests Failures Errors Success rate (%) Execution time Timestamp Execution time trend
9 0 0 100 12m5.073s 2025-12-07T06:48:53
Loading...

Test cases

Status Name Execution time Class Execution time trend
Success Execute batch job: GLT_Technical 1m12.874s
com.csc.sics.batch.test.BatchJobPostgreSQLTest
Loading...
Success Check batch job step status: GLT_Technical => Step 1: Unknown Job Step Type: null 8ms
com.csc.sics.batch.test.BatchJobPostgreSQLTest
Loading...
Success Check batch job status: GLT_Technical 2ms
com.csc.sics.batch.test.BatchJobPostgreSQLTest
Loading...
Success Execute batch job: GLT_Remittance 1m9.603s
com.csc.sics.batch.test.BatchJobPostgreSQLTest
Loading...
Success Check batch job step status: GLT_Remittance => Step 1: Unknown Job Step Type: null 3ms
com.csc.sics.batch.test.BatchJobPostgreSQLTest
Loading...
Success Check batch job status: GLT_Remittance 2ms
com.csc.sics.batch.test.BatchJobPostgreSQLTest
Loading...
Success Execute batch job: GLT_Pairing 1m15.044s
com.csc.sics.batch.test.BatchJobPostgreSQLTest
Loading...
Success Check batch job step status: GLT_Pairing => Step 1: Unknown Job Step Type: null 5ms
com.csc.sics.batch.test.BatchJobPostgreSQLTest
Loading...
Success Check batch job status: GLT_Pairing 2ms
com.csc.sics.batch.test.BatchJobPostgreSQLTest
Loading...

Test Suite: SicsDataComparisonPostgreSQLTest

Tests Failures Errors Success rate (%) Execution time Timestamp Execution time trend
12 0 0 100 2.375s 2025-12-07T06:48:53
Loading...

Test cases

Status Name Execution time Class Execution time trend
Success CompareGL_P_ALL 169ms
com.csc.sics.autotests.SicsDataComparisonPostgreSQLTest
Loading...
Success CountGL_P_ALL 14ms
com.csc.sics.autotests.SicsDataComparisonPostgreSQLTest
Loading...
Success CompareGL_P_NEW 56ms
com.csc.sics.autotests.SicsDataComparisonPostgreSQLTest
Loading...
Success CountGL_P_NEW 5ms
com.csc.sics.autotests.SicsDataComparisonPostgreSQLTest
Loading...
Success CompareGL_R_ALL 49ms
com.csc.sics.autotests.SicsDataComparisonPostgreSQLTest
Loading...
Success CountGL_R_ALL 4ms
com.csc.sics.autotests.SicsDataComparisonPostgreSQLTest
Loading...
Success CompareGL_R_NEW 40ms
com.csc.sics.autotests.SicsDataComparisonPostgreSQLTest
Loading...
Success CountGL_R_NEW 3ms
com.csc.sics.autotests.SicsDataComparisonPostgreSQLTest
Loading...
Success CompareGL_T_ALL 945ms
com.csc.sics.autotests.SicsDataComparisonPostgreSQLTest
Loading...
Success CountGL_T_ALL 7ms
com.csc.sics.autotests.SicsDataComparisonPostgreSQLTest
Loading...
Success CompareGL_T_NEW 447ms
com.csc.sics.autotests.SicsDataComparisonPostgreSQLTest
Loading...
Success CountGL_T_NEW 6ms
com.csc.sics.autotests.SicsDataComparisonPostgreSQLTest
Loading...